Context
6. Has the Policy's context adequately covered native vegetation values, opportunities and challenges? (Select all that apply)
Please select all that apply
Checkbox:
Unticked
The context section is broadly satisfactory
Checkbox:
Ticked
There are elements to be addressed (use text box below)
Please provide details on missing elements in the text box below
Would like to see details of land tenures made public so they can involve community discussion. This way threats can be highlighted, stringent polices and legislation implemented. Problems arise when decisions are made only for economic value without community consent.
Guiding Principles
7. How suitable are the guiding principles in providing a contemporary foundation for managing native vegetation? (Select all that apply)
Please select all that apply
Checkbox:
Unticked
The guiding principles are broadly suitable
Checkbox:
Ticked
There are elements to be addressed (use text box below)
Please provides details on missing elements in the text box below.
Would like to see detailed description of acceptable priorities allowing communities and governments to have impact on native vegetation.
Assurance the State Government plan is alighned with the National plan to avoid conflict of interest ie (business development, economic)
Assurance the State Government plan is alighned with the National plan to avoid conflict of interest ie (business development, economic)
Strategies and outcomes
8. How well do you support the strategies and outcomes?
| Strategies: The four strategies working together to enable policy evaluation and improvement Strongly support Radio button: Not checked Strongly support | Strategies: The four strategies working together to enable policy evaluation and improvement Support Radio button: Checked Support | Strategies: The four strategies working together to enable policy evaluation and improvement Neither Radio button: Not checked Neither | Strategies: The four strategies working together to enable policy evaluation and improvement Opposed Radio button: Not checked Opposed | Strategies: The four strategies working together to enable policy evaluation and improvement Strongly opposed Radio button: Not checked Strongly opposed |
| Outcome 1: Native vegetation is conserved and restored at landscape scale Strongly support Radio button: Not checked Strongly support | Outcome 1: Native vegetation is conserved and restored at landscape scale Support Radio button: Checked Support | Outcome 1: Native vegetation is conserved and restored at landscape scale Neither Radio button: Not checked Neither | Outcome 1: Native vegetation is conserved and restored at landscape scale Opposed Radio button: Not checked Opposed | Outcome 1: Native vegetation is conserved and restored at landscape scale Strongly opposed Radio button: Not checked Strongly opposed |
| Outcome 2: Certainty, transparency and data sharing improve Strongly support Radio button: Not checked Strongly support | Outcome 2: Certainty, transparency and data sharing improve Support Radio button: Checked Support | Outcome 2: Certainty, transparency and data sharing improve Neither Radio button: Not checked Neither | Outcome 2: Certainty, transparency and data sharing improve Opposed Radio button: Not checked Opposed | Outcome 2: Certainty, transparency and data sharing improve Strongly opposed Radio button: Not checked Strongly opposed |
| Outcome 3: Improved policy, practice and evaluation Strongly support Radio button: Checked Strongly support | Outcome 3: Improved policy, practice and evaluation Support Radio button: Not checked Support | Outcome 3: Improved policy, practice and evaluation Neither Radio button: Not checked Neither | Outcome 3: Improved policy, practice and evaluation Opposed Radio button: Not checked Opposed | Outcome 3: Improved policy, practice and evaluation Strongly opposed Radio button: Not checked Strongly opposed |
| Outcome 4: Native vegetation outcomes are achieved, together with other State priorities Strongly support Radio button: Not checked Strongly support | Outcome 4: Native vegetation outcomes are achieved, together with other State priorities Support Radio button: Not checked Support | Outcome 4: Native vegetation outcomes are achieved, together with other State priorities Neither Radio button: Checked Neither | Outcome 4: Native vegetation outcomes are achieved, together with other State priorities Opposed Radio button: Not checked Opposed | Outcome 4: Native vegetation outcomes are achieved, together with other State priorities Strongly opposed Radio button: Not checked Strongly opposed |
Please provide details on improving outcomes below.
Strategies : Important native vegetation areas located and boundaries implemented.
: large areas of native vegetation permanently protected.
Outcomes : Important native vegetation areas restored to their natural condition.
Strategies : Increase manufacture of steel and other suitable materials to be used for construction purposes.
: Increase manufacture of suitable materials for consumer goods and household products.
Outcomes : Unnecessary land clearing is no longer required, expansion of tree plantation industry concluded, ecoysystems are saved.
Strategies : Provide information to consumers and business about impacts on flora and fauna from many years of native vegetation clearing and degredation.
Outcomes : Substantial reduction in demand for timber materials and products.
: large areas of native vegetation permanently protected.
Outcomes : Important native vegetation areas restored to their natural condition.
Strategies : Increase manufacture of steel and other suitable materials to be used for construction purposes.
: Increase manufacture of suitable materials for consumer goods and household products.
Outcomes : Unnecessary land clearing is no longer required, expansion of tree plantation industry concluded, ecoysystems are saved.
Strategies : Provide information to consumers and business about impacts on flora and fauna from many years of native vegetation clearing and degredation.
Outcomes : Substantial reduction in demand for timber materials and products.
Goals and Approaches
9. How suitable are the goals and approaches in guiding implementation of the policy?
| Strategy 1 goals and approaches Suitable Radio button: Not checked Suitable | Strategy 1 goals and approaches Somewhat suitable Radio button: Checked Somewhat suitable | Strategy 1 goals and approaches Neither Radio button: Not checked Neither | Strategy 1 goals and approaches Somewhat unsuitable Radio button: Not checked Somewhat unsuitable | Strategy 1 goals and approaches Unsuitable Radio button: Not checked Unsuitable |
| Strategy 2 goals and approaches Suitable Radio button: Not checked Suitable | Strategy 2 goals and approaches Somewhat suitable Radio button: Checked Somewhat suitable | Strategy 2 goals and approaches Neither Radio button: Not checked Neither | Strategy 2 goals and approaches Somewhat unsuitable Radio button: Not checked Somewhat unsuitable | Strategy 2 goals and approaches Unsuitable Radio button: Not checked Unsuitable |
| Strategy 3 goals and approaches Suitable Radio button: Not checked Suitable | Strategy 3 goals and approaches Somewhat suitable Radio button: Checked Somewhat suitable | Strategy 3 goals and approaches Neither Radio button: Not checked Neither | Strategy 3 goals and approaches Somewhat unsuitable Radio button: Not checked Somewhat unsuitable | Strategy 3 goals and approaches Unsuitable Radio button: Not checked Unsuitable |
| Strategy 4 goals and approaches Suitable Radio button: Not checked Suitable | Strategy 4 goals and approaches Somewhat suitable Radio button: Checked Somewhat suitable | Strategy 4 goals and approaches Neither Radio button: Not checked Neither | Strategy 4 goals and approaches Somewhat unsuitable Radio button: Not checked Somewhat unsuitable | Strategy 4 goals and approaches Unsuitable Radio button: Not checked Unsuitable |
Strategy 1 goals and approaches
Goals : stop native vegetation and mature forest land clearing.
Approaches : plan for and inform public and private sectors.
Approaches : plan for and inform public and private sectors.
Roadmap
10. Which roadmap actions are most important?
| Regionally-tailored objectives and priorities (Actions 1.1 - 1.3) High priority Radio button: Checked High priority | Regionally-tailored objectives and priorities (Actions 1.1 - 1.3) Medium priority Radio button: Not checked Medium priority | Regionally-tailored objectives and priorities (Actions 1.1 - 1.3) Low priority Radio button: Not checked Low priority |
| Monitor and evaluate policy implementation (Action 1.4) High priority Radio button: Checked High priority | Monitor and evaluate policy implementation (Action 1.4) Medium priority Radio button: Not checked Medium priority | Monitor and evaluate policy implementation (Action 1.4) Low priority Radio button: Not checked Low priority |
| Review of existing mechanisms for protecting native vegetation (Action 1.5) High priority Radio button: Checked High priority | Review of existing mechanisms for protecting native vegetation (Action 1.5) Medium priority Radio button: Not checked Medium priority | Review of existing mechanisms for protecting native vegetation (Action 1.5) Low priority Radio button: Not checked Low priority |
| A focus on the Wheatbelt (Action 1.6 and 3.4) High priority Radio button: Checked High priority | A focus on the Wheatbelt (Action 1.6 and 3.4) Medium priority Radio button: Not checked Medium priority | A focus on the Wheatbelt (Action 1.6 and 3.4) Low priority Radio button: Not checked Low priority |
| Transparency of decision-making (Actions 2.1 - 2.3) High priority Radio button: Checked High priority | Transparency of decision-making (Actions 2.1 - 2.3) Medium priority Radio button: Not checked Medium priority | Transparency of decision-making (Actions 2.1 - 2.3) Low priority Radio button: Not checked Low priority |
| Systems to support decision-making and data sharing (Action 2.4) High priority Radio button: Checked High priority | Systems to support decision-making and data sharing (Action 2.4) Medium priority Radio button: Not checked Medium priority | Systems to support decision-making and data sharing (Action 2.4) Low priority Radio button: Not checked Low priority |
| Improve efficiency and clarity of the clearing permit process (Action 2.5) High priority Radio button: Checked High priority | Improve efficiency and clarity of the clearing permit process (Action 2.5) Medium priority Radio button: Not checked Medium priority | Improve efficiency and clarity of the clearing permit process (Action 2.5) Low priority Radio button: Not checked Low priority |
| Native vegetation mapping and monitoring (Actions 3.1 to 3.3) High priority Radio button: Checked High priority | Native vegetation mapping and monitoring (Actions 3.1 to 3.3) Medium priority Radio button: Not checked Medium priority | Native vegetation mapping and monitoring (Actions 3.1 to 3.3) Low priority Radio button: Not checked Low priority |
| Incentives and pricing for good stewardship (Action 4.1) High priority Radio button: Checked High priority | Incentives and pricing for good stewardship (Action 4.1) Medium priority Radio button: Not checked Medium priority | Incentives and pricing for good stewardship (Action 4.1) Low priority Radio button: Not checked Low priority |
| Environmental offsets (Actions 4.1a) & 4.2) High priority Radio button: Checked High priority | Environmental offsets (Actions 4.1a) & 4.2) Medium priority Radio button: Not checked Medium priority | Environmental offsets (Actions 4.1a) & 4.2) Low priority Radio button: Not checked Low priority |
| Other (use textbox) High priority Radio button: Checked High priority | Other (use textbox) Medium priority Radio button: Not checked Medium priority | Other (use textbox) Low priority Radio button: Not checked Low priority |
Please provide your answer in the text box below.
1.6 B In wheatbelt introduce land buyback program for wildlife corridors from coastal vegetation regions to inland vegetation regions.
Corridors minimum 5km wide up to 10km wide, maximum 50km apart.
Have regenerative agriculture farming land on the boundaries of these corridors.
1.8 Effective legislation for land tenures.
2.5 Implement legislation (land clearing permits are no longer available). applicants must be advised if land clearing is required then previously cleared land must be obtained.
Corridors minimum 5km wide up to 10km wide, maximum 50km apart.
Have regenerative agriculture farming land on the boundaries of these corridors.
1.8 Effective legislation for land tenures.
2.5 Implement legislation (land clearing permits are no longer available). applicants must be advised if land clearing is required then previously cleared land must be obtained.